HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT
24 Hour On-Duty Attorney: 425.829.5782
Fox Bowman Duarte

Newsroom

 

BELLEVUE OFFICE
1621 114th Ave. SE, Suite 210
Bellevue, WA 98004
(view map)
(directions to firm)

Contact Us
Phone: 425.451.1995
Fax: 425.451.3820

24 Hour On-Duty Attorney:
425.829.5782

BELLINGHAM OFFICE
12 Bellwether Way, Suite 114
Bellingham, WA 98225
(view map)
(directions to firm)

Contact Us
Phone: 360.671.4384
Fax: 360.671.4390

After Hours Emergency:
206.715.5150

Talking on Cell Phone Leads to DUI arrest?

May 15th, 2010

Experience has shown that many DUI arrests result from the police stopping a car for reasons that have nothing to do with driving under the influence. For instance, many DUI arrests in Washington State result from an investigation following an officer stopping a vehicle for speeding, failing to use a signal, or similar …

Getting a DUI as a Minor Can Affect You After Age 21

May 4th, 2010

Question: I am 20 years old and recently got a DUI. My license is suspended for one year. Will I be able to go to the bar when I turn 21? Answer: The first thing to consider is whether you are allowed to enter a bar at all based …

30 Days for Refusing a DUI Breath Test?

April 10th, 2010

One of the relatively unknown aspects of Washington State DUI law is that the penalties for violations of certain mandatory requirements of probation will result in mandatory sentences that the judge must impose. Take the case of an individual for whom this is the first DUI conviction. Either one or two days of jail time [...]

Changes to Deferred Prosecution Law Can Affect Your Sentence

March 22nd, 2010

For some people, it makes sense to enter into a deferred prosecution after getting charged with a DUI in Washington. To qualify for a deferred prosecution, chemical addiction or alcoholism must play a significant part in why you broke the law. After acknowledging this, you must commit to a significant program of chemical dependency treatment. [...]

Meteors, Cosmic Rays and DUI defense

March 20th, 2010

Recent happenings (March, 2010) reveal some unusual defenses to DUI charges. First, there was the decision of the Court of Appeals in State of Washington vs. Richard Charles Tracer, No. 37812-4-II. This was a Washington State DUI/Vehicular Assault case where the Court of Appeals discussed the propriety of the legal procedure employed by the trial [...]

DUI Jury Renders Verdict on System of Justice

January 30th, 2010

Recently I represented a client who was charged with DUI in the Seattle area after a detention and arrest by a local police officer. A review of the police report led me to believe that this could be a difficult case. All the “signs” police are trained to look for were in this report: Weaving, speeding, [...]

Work Vehicle exception to Ignition Interlock Requirement

October 24th, 2009

An ignition interlock license is a license that permits one to drive during a period of license suspension resulting from a DUI arrest or conviction so long as the vehicle being driven is equipped with an ignition interlock device and SR22 insurance is in place. See RCW 46.20.385. Prior law required the device …

What is a Washington state DUI?

September 19th, 2009

Under Washington law DUI is defined by RCW 46.61.502, which states: (1) A person is guilty of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug if the person drives a vehicle within this state: (a) And the person has, within two hours after driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 …

Washington Supreme Court Holds Tribal Police Officer Can Pursue DUI Drivers Off The Reservation!

September 17th, 2009

In an unusual case arising from a Washington State DUI arrest, the Washington Supreme Court today held that a Lummi Nation tribal police officer who witnessed a DUI motorist on the reservation driving at night with high beams and drifting across the center divider could pursue the vehicle off the reservation and then detain the [...]

Are Mandatory Blood Draws Coming to Washington?

September 14th, 2009

There is a nationwide push to train police officers as phlebotomists, i.e. blood drawers. This is because the United States Supreme Court has previously ruled that an officer with probable cause can forcibly take a suspects blood. As I write this there are pilot programs in Texas and Idaho to train officers …